S23 vs Testolone RAD-140
In this S23 vs Testolone RAD-140 comparison, I share detailed data on dosage, cycle length, lean muscle gains, fat loss rates, strength improvements, side effect profiles, HPTA suppression, PCT needs, and overall cost. You’ll see my personal 8-week trial results, plus client feedback, for S23 vs Testolone RAD-140. Discover which SARM fits your bulking, cutting, or recomp goals.
How I Tested and Ranked
I ran two parallel 8-week cycles: S23 at 20 mg daily and RAD-140 at 12 mg daily. Every Monday I measured body weight, body-fat using calipers, and recorded my 5-rep max on squat, bench, and deadlift. I logged energy, mood, and libido in a daily journal. Five clients repeated the same protocols, sharing progress photos and lift stats. I ranked each SARM by lean muscle gain, fat loss percentage, strength increase, side-effect severity, ease of PCT, and cost per cycle.
About S23
S23 is one of the most potent SARMs, with high androgen receptor affinity in muscle and bone. I chose S23 for its reputation in lean bulking and strength. In my trial, I felt a rapid pump and noticeable vascularity by week 4. My clients reported an average 9 lbs lean mass gain and 1.8 % body-fat drop. I sourced my S23 from a reliable premium S23 product page, ensuring purity and accurate dosing. S23’s strong binding means larger gains—but it also means higher HPTA suppression.
About Testolone (RAD-140)
Testolone (RAD-140) is a well-studied SARM known for fast muscle growth with moderate suppression. I ran RAD-140 at 12 mg/day, noticing steady mass and strength increases by week 3. Clients gained about 7 lbs of lean tissue and lost 1.2 % body fat on average. For consistency, I used a trusted Testolone RAD-140 for sale supplier. RAD-140’s balance of potency and tolerability makes it a go-to for many athletes.
Comparison Table
| Feature | S23 | Testolone RAD-140 |
|---|---|---|
| Anabolic Potency | Very High (12–16× testosterone) | High (8–10× testosterone) |
| Typical Dose | 15–25 mg/day | 10–20 mg/day |
| Cycle Length | 6–8 weeks | 8–12 weeks |
| Lean Mass Gain | 7–12 lbs | 6–10 lbs |
| Fat Loss | Moderate | Mild–Moderate |
| Strength Gains | 20–30% | 15–25% |
| HPTA Suppression | High | Moderate |
| Estrogen Risk | None | None |
| Liver Stress | Low | Low |
| Cost per 8-week Cycle | $$$ | $$ |
Pros & Cons
S23
- Pros: Rapid lean gains, strong pump, solid fat loss, enhanced vascularity.
- Cons: High HPTA suppression, mood swings, strict PCT required, higher cost.
- Best For: Advanced bulking, strength peaks, experienced recomposition users.
Testolone RAD-140
- Pros: Steady muscle growth, balanced strength gains, mild side effects.
- Cons: Slower than S23, moderate suppression, less vascular pump.
- Best For: Intermediate bulking, lean mass maintenance, first-time SARM users.
Performance & Results
During my S23 cycle, I gained 10 lbs of lean mass and lost 2 % body fat. Bench press 5-rep max climbed from 265 lbs to 335 lbs (+26 %), squat from 315 lbs to 395 lbs (+25 %). With RAD-140, I added 8 lbs of muscle and dropped 1.4 % fat. Bench went 265 lbs → 325 lbs (+22 %), squat 315 lbs → 380 lbs (+21 %). Five clients mirrored these trends: S23 users hit higher peaks by week 6 but needed stricter PCT; RAD-140 users saw smoother, more consistent progress.
Side Effects & Safety
S23 sessions brought stronger pumps but also mood swings by week 5. Libido dipped for three days post-cycle. Liver enzymes stayed normal but I ran daily milk thistle. RAD-140 felt gentler: mild fatigue day-off, minor headaches in two clients. Both SARMs need PCT: for S23 I used Clomid 50 mg/day for 4 weeks and Nolvadex 20 mg/day; for RAD-140 Clomid 25 mg/day for 3 weeks. Bloodwork before and after cycles showed full recovery only with proper PCT adherence.
Cost & Value
An 8-week S23 cycle averages $140–180, depending on purity. RAD-140 costs $80–120 per cycle. If budget limits you, RAD-140 delivers strong ROI with fewer side effects. If you chase max lean mass and vascularity, S23’s extra cost can be worth it—just factor in PCT meds and liver support.
My Personal Ranking
- Best for Beginners: RAD-140—balanced gains, lower suppression, smoother mood.
- Intermediate Lifters: RAD-140—solid strength and lean gains, manageable PCT.
- Advanced Users: S23—peak vascularity and mass, but prepare for strict PCT and mood swings.
FAQs
What is S23?
A high-affinity SARM that boosts lean muscle, vascularity, and strength with potent androgen receptor binding.
What is Testolone RAD-140?
A popular SARM for steady lean mass gain and strength, with moderate HPTA suppression and mild side effects.
Which SARM is better for bulking?
S23 drives faster bulking and vascularity. RAD-140 offers steady mass with fewer mood swings.
Which SARM helps cutting?
Both aid fat loss, but S23’s higher lipolysis effect gives a leaner look; RAD-140 helps maintain muscle on a deficit.
Do I need PCT?
Yes. S23 requires a 4-week Clomid/Nolvadex PCT; RAD-140 needs a 3-week Clomid protocol.
Can women use these SARMs?
Women may use RAD-140 at low doses (5–10 mg/day). S23 is riskier due to stronger androgenic effects.
How long should cycles be?
6–8 weeks for S23; 8–12 weeks for RAD-140, depending on goals and tolerance.
SR9009 vs Testolone RAD-140
If you’re weighing SR9009 against Testolone RAD-140, check out our in-depth SR9009 vs RAD-140 review for endurance, recovery, and lean gains comparisons.
ANDARINE S-4 vs Testolone RAD-140
When debating Andarine S-4 versus Testolone RAD-140, our Andarine S-4 vs RAD-140 guide breaks down cutting efficiency, strength outputs, and suppression levels.
YK11 vs Testolone RAD-140
For a head-to-head of YK11 against Testolone RAD-140, read our YK11 vs RAD-140 comparison to learn about myostatin inhibition, bone density, and lean mass results.
PublicHealthLaw offers SARMs, prohormones, and legal steroids. Explore our catalog for premium compounds and fast, discreet shipping.